Main

June 17, 2007

Looking for some Dam Justice

Protest traffic jam

I first went to Costa Rica about four years ago and it was at that time that many Costa Ricans were protesting the possible privatization of their communications company, at the same time teachers were protesting their pension fund being slashed. Apart from the graffiti I didn't actually come face to face with the demonstrations until several days before I left on my six week trip. The teachers were marching from the capitol to another city nearly 20km away and I was on a bus that going that same way. Well, needless to say it was a hot 30-45 minutes on the bus until we got around them. It didn't occur to me that they were intentionally blocking the highway.

The last day on my way to the airport I learned that blocking the highway wasn't just something that they happened to do while marching it was a tactic in and of itself. As we actually had a flight to catch it was more than just a little frustrating for us. Luckily we had a resourceful bus driver who ducked around off ramps to get around the protest and get us to the airport in time. I remember thinking at the time that it seemed like a good way to turn people against your cause.

Yesterday the group that Christine works for organized a protest against the dams the government is building, among other things like mining and water privatization. Basically, we blocked off an entire lane of the Pan American highway at a major intersection, effectively blocking another major road.

Casa Pastoral team protest

I'll get into the techniques and my list of things that would make it significantly more effective in a minute but I think it's more important to discuss what exactly they were protesting. The government has plans to build at least two new major dams on top of the two they already have. These new dams would flood quite a large area of land and displace an untold number of people. Considering that El Salvador has the population density of Japan but instead of living in cities they all live in the country side, especially along rivers, it could be a lot of people.

The other two dams are used to generate electricity for the country, which I'm not against really. I think that if it were done properly a lot of people could use the stored water behind the dam during the rainy season to irrigate their crops. That's really the best time to grow stuff because it's so sunny. However, I don't think they use the stored water that way and really they ought to be using solar power, we're in the tropics for pete's sake.

In my opinion the main issue here is recompensation. The poor displaced people will be getting nothing or very little in return for their lost land. The issue is that after the civil war the government was supposed to give out parcels of land to the poor. However, ARENA, the military side's party, has been in charge of the federal government since then and has been quick to dole out the parcels to its supporters and completely halted giving land titles to the FMLN supporters. Thus the government won’t have to pay those people for their flooded land.

The other issues at hand were the gold mining companies being given free reign and no pollution restrictions. The rivers that they are dredging are quickly being contaminated with mercury and other nasty things that the poor have no choice but to drink. One of the things that strikes you when you're here in El Salvador is how many deformed people there are. You'll probably see more in one day than months or even years in the U.S. Of course, a lot of those effects are from the unregulated use of DDT for so many years, but the mercury poisoning is going to start having an effect in the form of Minamata disease.

Incredibly long protest banner

I haven't heard any hard details about the water privatization. That's really one of the frustrating things about the protesters here. They don't do much if any research on the things that they're protesting. That's why I can't tell you exactly what the dam will be used for, how many people will be displaced, who is going to benefit, etc. The leaders just seemed to be assuming that every major government project was evil, which isn't that terrible of an assumption here. It's also probably the reason their only chants were, “No to the dams, No mining, No to water privatization!”

When Christine and I got there we immediately wanted to help so we set about handing out the flyers they'd printed to the stopped traffic. Most of them didn't seem too thrilled about the whole thing. I think that's the effect sitting in 30 minutes of traffic because of you does to people. We probably handed out a thousand or so before the whole protest ran out. We could easily have handed out 10 times as many.

The flyers were pretty ridiculous it was a half sheet of paper printed on both sides in size 12 font. There was one heading that may have been in 14 point font. The problem is most people here, if they can read, can't see very well and are intimidated by that much writing. The other thing is that actual text of the flyer was all about Jesus and how he would be against the dams and would want the people to keep their land. It had nothing really informative about the facts of what was going on with the dams, arguments for and against, etc.

Christine dam protest

They had the same problem with the banners they had made. They tried to fit 3 sentences on a banner, which were so cluttered I couldn't even read them from 10 feet away. On top of that they were holding them parallel to the single lane we had open so unless people could read them in the instant they were driving by, they might as well have been blank.

One other problem I had with the whole thing was that they drove in a big truck to carry these large speakers, a gas generator all to amplify their voice when a simple megaphone would have done the trick and actually been of better quality probably as the microphone kept cutting in and out.

Anyway, that was a lot of criticism but I really do think they're doing the right thing. I just want them to be more effective at it. Pissing off thousands of people and not effectively telling them why you're wasting their time seems counter productive. Christine mentioned that it would be better to spread out around a big city at stop lights, I think she's on to something. Of course they would be missing out on the solidarity building that the centralized speaking provides, but there's no reason not to do both.

February 20, 2007

The Tao of Disc Golf

Tao ponders the chains

Last Sunday Chad, Dimitri, and I went and played a round out at one of the nicer disc golf courses on the nicest day I've experienced since I've been back in the U.S.. I played once in Jackson with Allan before I left and although I was throwing pretty straight I wasn't getting much distance. The next day my shoulder let me know why, I just didn't have the muscle for it anymore.

It was the first time I'd played in more than a year and being away from it for so long has given me more perspective on it. I've started I stop and visualize it. I wait until I can actually see the disc in the air, then I find something off in the distance to line up with where I want to release the disc. It can be a branch, a rock, a patch of discolored grass, whatever. I just keep my eyes locked on it and keep imagining that flight path. Sure enough it works really great, however there are more aspects to it than that.

The first thing is that you have to be familiar with your discs and how they fly when you throw them different ways. When I played in Jackson with Allan and in Austin with Chad and Dimitri I wasn't using my own discs so it made visualizing harder. Today and yesterday I played at the course across the street from my Mom's house with my own discs and was even or under par for most of the rounds. Normally I do well over par on that particular course.

Another thing I think is important is muscle memory for throwing. I used to have to think, "ok, now keep your arm level and snap your wrist", etc. All of that clutters up the mind and distracts from visualizing. Once you've got the throwing motion locked into muscle memory it really opens up your mind to concentrate on what you're trying to achieve. Even after not playing for over a year it came right back to me, no problem.

The last component of an all-around good disc golf game is sound strategy. You have to know what your range is for putting. If you're outside of your comfort zone, just lay-up. That simple bit of strategy has saved me massive numbers of shots to be sure. The next big thing for putting anyway is the "aim small, miss small" technique. This is really just an extension of the visualization technique, but if I calm myself down and do it every time I put I notice a much higher success rate.

The last major strategy technique that a lot of new people get stuck on is that it is absolutely key to keep the disc FLAT and LOW to the ground when throwing unless you're shooting over a particular obstacle. The higher you throw the disc the farther it will slide off on one direction or the other. If it's lower it won't go as far to either side, it will instead use that energy to go farther straight. In order to keep your disc flat you have to release it flat so pay attention to the motion your hand makes. Its also important to note that the more spin you put on the disc, the more gyroscopic force you put on it, which resists turning.

Chad Leathers playing disc golf

Even without enormous muscles, if you follow those techniques I can almost guarantee you you'll play better. The key is to stay calm and focused on what you're doing. It's fine to screw around and have fun in between shots, but when it comes time to throw take your time and calm your mind.

July 11, 2006

This post could save your life.

   Seriously, and not to mention our so-called civilization on this planet. For a long time I’ve thought that the root of all the great problems of our world boil down to selfishness. Greed is what gets most of the attention, but that’s really just a subsection of general selfishness. We can be selfish by doing things just to make our lives easier in other ways, choosing paradigms that allow us to feel guilt-free. I’m not going to sit here and tell you that I am an unselfish person, but I can sit here and tell you that I try my best to realize when I’m doing something selfish and stop it.

   This post stems from some recent books that I’ve read and plan on re-reading that every single one of you should read. They were both sent to me by my Dad and if I could send each of you a copy of them I would. The first one will most directly impact your immediate life and the lives of those around you. It’s called The China Study by T.Colin Campbell. It explains in simple terms the mountains of scientific evidence that point to animal protein as the leading promoter of cancer, heart disease, diabetes, breast cancer and the majority of the most common and sinister diseases that seem to be plaguing our society. He was able to actively turn on and off cancer growth by changing the diet of mice. 23 of 24 type II diabetes patients no longer had to inject themselves with insulin after 3 weeks on a whole foods/plant-based diet. Heart disease can actually be reversed with a diet.

   It seems to be a common misconception that we need as much protein as we can get and the best and pretty much only place to get that is from meat. This is completely untrue. In actuality we only need about 5% of our diet to be protein to replace the protein that our body wears out. The average American eats a diet of about 20% protein, the vast majority of which is animal protein. Unknown to many people, plants have more than enough protein to cover that 5%, depending on the plant of course. In fact, plant protein even in large percentages is harmless, but any diet with over 10% animal protein is in serious trouble.

   The China Study was this giant health and diet study that was done in China(shocker), where the experiment done with the mice was basically compared to humans, and it was found to be exactly the same. The thing is that in China they don’t or didn’t until recently eat very much meat and so there were extremely low rates of cancer and heart disease. The people they did find with high rates of cancer and other diseases of affluence were the wealth Chinese.

   Now this is the part where I get back to the selfishness that I was talking about earlier. If I were to go out on the street and tell your average American that he/she could avoid Cancer, Heart Disease, Diabetes, Alzheimers, Breast Cancer, Prostate Cancer, and basically all of the major killers in our country simply by eating a whole foods/plant-based diet the response I would get 90% of the time would be this. “You mean, I’d have to give up cheese, milk, and steak? I’d rather enjoy myself now and just not live as long than give all of that up.” While it’s absolutely their right to do that, they are completely ignoring every single person that cares for them. It is completely selfish to trade years of having your loved ones what you painfully and slowly dieing so that you can enjoy the flavor of some food that you like. We have to realize that just because we like something doesn’t mean it’s good for us, and we ought it to ourselves and the people that love us to make the best decision. I’m sure that heroine users really enjoy heroine, does that mean that they should do it?

   So, that’s the first book that could save your life and potentially many peoples lives if you go so far as to encourage others to read it. Because I can not do it justice with a page of text, you need to see the graphs, the charts, the conclusive evidence that says, this is why you’re going to get cancer if you don’t change your lifestyle. Sure, it would be nice to not have to give up things that give us some brief fleeting happiness, but the extra pain-free years you can spend with your loved ones should more than make up for it. Not to mention the weight-loss and overall sense of well-being and health. In case it’s not clear, I’m through with meat, eggs, and dairy. I’ve toyed with the idea before, but now that I’ve had the case laid out clearly to me, that’s it. Does it mean that I’m going to be picking through ingredient labels looking for the slightest sign of them. Absolutely not, I’m simply going to avoid the food that clearly contains large amounts of them, it’s really just as simple as that. My diet has much more variety now and I don’t feel that I’ve given up much in the way of flavor. I am however looking for vegan and vegetarian recipes. So if you’re sitting on some, hit me up.

   The second book may save your life as well, but on a planetary level. It’s called Plan B 2.0 by Lester R. Brown. He basically goes through all of the major problems that we face as a planet, explains their causes and likely outcomes if nothing is done. It’s very informative and puts facts and clear explanations to all things such as global warming, falling water tables, the looming oil crisis, poverty, and overpopulation. I have to say that the first half of the book is fairly depressing. The problems seem so monumental and the mind set necessary to change course is just not there in our world. We have this sense that the world is in trouble, but the individualism that capitalism promotes has us all so focused on our own lives and problems that there seems to be no way to really organize and do something cooperatively, which is really the only way it can be solved.

   I’m going to get to selfishness a little bit faster on this book because it just seems to stare you down. We like to tout our individualism, especially in the west, as this badge of freedom. While the world would be a horribly boring place if everyone were the same, we should understand that the things we own are not what make us individuals, simply being and thinking in the ways that come naturally to us are all the individualism we could ever need. I feel that capitalism in general breeds this unhealthy form of individualism, and instead of sitting somewhere on the middle of having both a sense of self and a sense of community we are pushed by advertising and an enveloping mentality that we are what is important. Not the community. This is selfishness.

   I think that currently the only way people will begin to act on a global scale is when the problems cause such catastrophic effects that they invade so many people’s personal life bubbles that they will all recognize that they have something in common. They are a community whether they would like to forget it or not. This is unfortunate because while we may learn a valuable lesson, it will undoubtedly be at a great expense and there will be no guarantee that the problems will be solvable by that point.

   So let me get back to the book. He doesn’t call it Plan B for nothing. He shows that we have well within our means to solve virtually all of these problems. He roughly estimates that it would cost about $160 billion/year to begin to reverse the processes we have set in motion. This is a very minimal sum considering the U.S. spends $460 billion/year on the Military alone. Frankly, I think that if you ignore the Military/Industrial complex for a moment, that the most effective way to fight a ‘War on Terrorism’ is to take the fire out of their argument. How could they justify attacking a country that is actively and effectively eliminating poverty, illiteracy, and inequality? It would be the best money the Military had ever spent; the problem is the money would not be going into their own pockets.

   To sum it all up then, you owe it to yourself and the people you love to read The China Study and you owe it to the World, including yourself and the people you love, to read Plan B 2.0. If you like them and feel at least a fraction as strongly as I do about them, then you’ll pass along your own review to friends and family. Start the revolution!